Skip to main content

Relocating in Retirement: Don't Make These Common Mistakes


While most Americans show a desire to age in place, retirement can also be the ideal time to sell your home and relocate or downsize. Kids are typically grown up and moved out of the home, and the need to be close to work is gone, so many seniors use retirement as a catalyst for relocating. Some relocate because of a lifestyle or climate change, others want to be to family, and others due purely to financial circumstances. Whatever the reason, retirees appear to be making two big mistakes with their homes. They seem to vastly misunderstand the home as an investment decision, and they don’t consider the financing options available to them at all.

In the 2017 National Association of REALTORS® Home Buyer and Seller Generational Trends Report, homebuyers were asked to compare the purchase of their home as a financial investment as compared to a stock. Amazingly, 80 percent of those ages 61-70 viewed it as a good financial investment, with over half stating it was a better investment than stocks. Now, while stocks are more volatile, they do appear to be a far better investment option than a single family home. Generally speaking, homes keep pace with inflation and provide no real returns over time. Additionally, many senior-owned homes tend to decrease in real value terms over time due to a lack of updates and upkeep to the home. In 2017 the Dow posted a 25 percent return, while home values have surged over the past year, only netting out a roughly 6 percent return over the same time period. While 6 percent would normally be great, it pales in comparison to stock returns over the past year.

This does not mean that purchasing a home is a bad decision. You need a place to live, and buying a home is often a better financial decision than renting. The reality is that homes are not good investments, but they can still be a good financial decision. Nevertheless, the fact remains that stocks have proved historically to be a good investment in the long run, while homes stay flat when adjusted for inflation.

When relocating in retirement, a new home purchase must be financed or funded in some way. There are a lot of options for doing this; however, few seniors appear to be reviewing the entire range of financing options. According to the same 2017 NAR® Generational study, roughly 68 percent of home buyers aged 61-70 financed their home, with a median percent of their home financed at 81 percent. Additionally, 89 percent of these individuals used a conventional mortgage. Another 4 percent used a fixed then adjustable rate, 2 percent used an adjustable rate, 4 percent didn’t know what type of mortgage they used, and 2 percent responded other.

In the end, the majority of seniors relocating are doing one of two things, mostly financing their home purchase through a traditional mortgage or buying the new home outright. Unfortunately, both of these options come with some serious drawbacks. Taking out a new mortgage to almost fully finance the home purchase in retirement creates some serious cash flow and repayment issues. Additionally, those purchasing a home outright with cash are essentially investing and locking up a lot of their wealth into one asset that does not provide great returns over time.

Instead, more seniors should consider putting some money down and financing a portion of the home with a HECM for Purchase, which is a variation of a reverse mortgage. This can mitigate problems on both sides by eliminating the requirement to make monthly mortgage payments and freeing up cash for other uses. Additionally, with less than 1 percent of seniors using a reverse mortgage, and even fewer using it to purchase a home through the HECM for purchase program, more seniors need to understand the program and its benefits. Reverse mortgages were designed by the Government to allow senior homeowners to tap into their home equity to support their retirement. A number of years ago HUD revamped the program to also allow homeowners 62+ to buy a home with a variation of the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage, commonly referred to as a reverse mortgage. While the more common reverse mortgage allows homeowners to leverage a portion of the equity in their home, the HECM for Purchase is designed for those 62+ to purchase a home by putting forth about half of the cost of purchase price and financing the other half with the HECM for Purchase.  This allows the homeowner to not have to fully fund the purchase through a conventional mortgage or pay all cash up-front.

Chris Kargacos, SVP of Sales at Retirement Funding Solutions, a leading lender of the HECM for Purchase, stated “this program can be a good option for senior buyers who are looking to right size their housing needs and potentially bolster their retirement portfolio or improve their cash flow position. While this may not be a fit for everyone, it can be a viable option for some.” While the HECM for Purchase does not make sense for everyone, it makes sense for a lot more buyers than are currently using the program. (For more information on the HECM for Purchase check out this guide provided by the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association or check out this short video).

When it comes to retirement and your home, look at the options out there and understand how each decision impacts your entire retirement plan. Taking on debt through a conventional mortgage or a reverse mortgage can be a viable strategy to facilitate a home purchase in retirement, but understand the impact and costs associated with the transaction. Don’t view the home as an investment strategy but instead as purchasing a place to live that will support your desired lifestyle goals in retirement. Where to live is one of the most important decisions you will make in retirement, so take the time to review your options and understand the implications of financing your new retirement home.


Relocating in Retirement: Don't Make These Common Mistakes curated from Forbes - Real Estate

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Vacation rental company Vacasa buys Sterling Resorts

Vacation rental management tech startup  Vacasa  isn’t slowing down its ambitions to conquer the market: this week, it announced that it has purchased Sterling Resorts, a vacation management company on Florida’s Gulf Coast. Sterling has changed hands before: it was  bought by Pacifica Companies in 2015 and currently manages 450 homes. Now it will become a part of Vacasa’s effort to expand its presence in vacation destinations such as northern Florida, where Sterling is based. At the time of this latest purchase, Sterling’s home inventory was  down from 585 properties in 2015. Vacasa has raised more than $200 million since its launch ten years ago. Founder Eric Breon said he was motivated to start the company after struggling to find a satisfactory management solution for a cabin belonging to his wife’s family on the Washington coast. Now Vacasa seeks to provide rental property owners with “a seamless experience…through innovative technology and local staff,” that give them

In An Era Of WeWork, Co-Working Space NeueHouse Sits Above The Fray

NeueHouse CEO Josh Wyatt Seuss Moments In today’s cluttered co-working landscape, it can be hard for companies to makes themselves heard over the din. Elevated co-working space  NeueHouse  wants to create an unparalleled experience for creatives through elevated programming and outstanding design. NeueHouse describes itself as “ a private cultural and collaborative space for prominent creatives, artists and entrepreneurs,” with current locations in Los Angeles and New York. In November, following an announcement of $30 million in funding , the company announced Josh Wyatt as its new CEO. Wyatt is a veteran of the hospitality industry, having co-founded Generator  in 2007, a chain of culture-focused hostels targeted at millennials, before moving on to Equinox to head the fitness brand’s hotel developments in New York City. Forbes interviewed Wyatt to talk about creativity, design, the gun threat incident at NeueHouse New York, and why he isn't phased by his "800 p

Could Ken Griffin's Penthouse Purchase Cost NYC Real Estate Buyers Millions?

'The Billionaire's Bunker' at 220 Central Park South is pictured on January 24, 2019, in New York - Hedge fund billionaire Ken Griffin has completed the purchase of a four-story penthouse in the building for $238 millionm- the most ever paid for a home in the US. The building is a residential skyscraper that is currently under construction. (Photo credit: TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP/Getty Images) Getty A 2014 bill that aims to impose an additional tax on part-time New York residents—dubbed the “pied-a-terre tax”—has risen from the dead, largely in thanks to the recent record-breaking Central Park penthouse purchase by billionaire Ken Griffin. Griffin, worth an estimated $11.7 billion and No. 45 on the Forbes 400 , reportedly bought the $238 million-dollar apartment “as a place to stay when he’s in town,” according to his representatives. The purchase drew widespread attention to the financial losses that part-time and foreign property owners can cause the city. Bec